<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MICHAEL MOORE vs. CNN</title>
	<link>http://www.thedailysquid.com/2007/07/11/michael-moore-vs-cnn/</link>
	<description>An inkless outlet of poetry, politics and boneless sea fauna.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: The Daily Squid &#187; MICHAEL MOORE v. CNN, ALL DONE</title>
		<link>http://www.thedailysquid.com/2007/07/11/michael-moore-vs-cnn/#comment-4769</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thedailysquid.com/2007/07/11/michael-moore-vs-cnn/#comment-4769</guid>
					<description>[...] Moore calls truce on beef between he and CNN. This statement from the Moore camp is pretty spot-on: CNN&amp;#8217;s report attempted to challenge &amp;#8216;SiCKO&amp;#8217; by arguing the film only used facts that backed up the movie&amp;#8217;s thesis. In fact CNN, by creating confusion over the acceptability of using different reports and research, along with using a biased expert whose background was not identified, engaged in the very tactics it was attempting to accuse &amp;#8216;SiCKO&amp;#8217; of using. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Moore calls truce on beef between he and CNN. This statement from the Moore camp is pretty spot-on: CNN&#8217;s report attempted to challenge &#8216;SiCKO&#8217; by arguing the film only used facts that backed up the movie&#8217;s thesis. In fact CNN, by creating confusion over the acceptability of using different reports and research, along with using a biased expert whose background was not identified, engaged in the very tactics it was attempting to accuse &#8216;SiCKO&#8217; of using. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
