<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MICHAEL MOORE vs. CNN</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedailysquid.com/2007/07/11/michael-moore-vs-cnn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedailysquid.com/2007/07/11/michael-moore-vs-cnn/</link>
	<description>Politics meets pop culture. With poems.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 21:55:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Daily Squid &#187; MICHAEL MOORE v. CNN, ALL DONE</title>
		<link>http://www.thedailysquid.com/2007/07/11/michael-moore-vs-cnn/comment-page-1/#comment-4769</link>
		<dc:creator>The Daily Squid &#187; MICHAEL MOORE v. CNN, ALL DONE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedailysquid.com/2007/07/11/michael-moore-vs-cnn/#comment-4769</guid>
		<description>[...] Moore calls truce on beef between he and CNN. This statement from the Moore camp is pretty spot-on: CNN&#8217;s report attempted to challenge &#8216;SiCKO&#8217; by arguing the film only used facts that backed up the movie&#8217;s thesis. In fact CNN, by creating confusion over the acceptability of using different reports and research, along with using a biased expert whose background was not identified, engaged in the very tactics it was attempting to accuse &#8216;SiCKO&#8217; of using. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Moore calls truce on beef between he and CNN. This statement from the Moore camp is pretty spot-on: CNN&#8217;s report attempted to challenge &#8216;SiCKO&#8217; by arguing the film only used facts that backed up the movie&#8217;s thesis. In fact CNN, by creating confusion over the acceptability of using different reports and research, along with using a biased expert whose background was not identified, engaged in the very tactics it was attempting to accuse &#8216;SiCKO&#8217; of using. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
